16 stories
·
1 follower

Parenthetical Names

2 Comments and 3 Shares
I never got around to seeing that movie about the battle (of Midway).
Read the whole story
davidar
10 days ago
reply
Geralt (of Rivia (the butcher (of Blaviken)))
jungy
9 days ago
:D
fancycwabs
9 days ago
I think I can name two songs by Toad (the wet sprocket).
alt_text_bot
10 days ago
reply
I never got around to seeing that movie about the battle (of Midway).
Share this story
Delete

OK/okay/ok

5 Comments and 9 Shares
After changing it back and forth several times and consulting with internet linguist Gretchen McCulloch, I settled on "ok" in my book How To, but I'm still on the fence. Maybe I should just switch to "oK."
Read the whole story
davidar
14 days ago
reply
okies - also kind of old but in a different way
alt_text_bot
15 days ago
reply
After changing it back and forth several times and consulting with internet linguist Gretchen McCulloch, I settled on "ok" in my book How To, but I'm still on the fence. Maybe I should just switch to "oK."
yaomtc
15 days ago
Who runs this bot? Quote marks haven't worked for a while.
joeythesaint
15 days ago
Check your font encoding and browser settings. Quote marks seem fine here: https://imgur.com/3j3YNk6
tedder
15 days ago
They fail on the Android app.
yaomtc
15 days ago
Correct, I should have specified. They work fine on desktop, just not on the Android app. Maybe it's just an issue with the app rendering certain characters in comments. I may post an issue on the Github. ("Test.") EDIT: My quotation marks work fine, as do the quotes in mburch42's comment. I guess the Android app handles comments differently, as the HTML of joeythesaint's link becomes visible.
tedder
15 days ago
Agree, AltTextBot's are the only broken ones on Android. All look correct on iOS and on a desktop browser. I think the 'bot is sending quot entity versus the actual quotes and it happens to render wrong on Android (though this theory doesn't follow Occam, which would blame the Android app).
Aissen
14 days ago
@yaomtc @tedder I run the bot. Thanks for the report, I'll check it out. EDIT: it should now be fixed for future alt texts.
yaomtc
13 days ago
Thanks, Aissen! I created an issue: https://github.com/samuelclay/NewsBlur/issues/1272
Share this story
Delete
2 public comments
yaomtc
13 days ago
reply
[Commented on the wrong thing and I can't delete]
mburch42
15 days ago
reply
Sometimes in older books they spell it "okeh" which is really wild.

53 Cards

4 Comments and 13 Shares
Well, there's one right here at the bottom, where it says "53."
Read the whole story
davidar
92 days ago
reply
Also people claiming to have invented lossless compression schemes which are guaranteed to compress every possible file.
zippy72
90 days ago
And got parents on them approved as well...
wishngrab
86 days ago
Ha ha very funny.Good. Wishngrab.com Keep it up
alt_text_bot
92 days ago
reply
Well, there's one right here at the bottom, where it says "53."
popular
91 days ago
reply
Share this story
Delete
2 public comments
lograh
89 days ago
reply
For a bit there I was expecting a Banach–Tarski joke.
Covarr
91 days ago
reply
If there's one thing I know about binary, it's that 1+1=10. If there's one thing I know about basic arithmetic, it's that 10-2=8. So if you spend one energy unit, then spend one more, and have a net gain of 8, that sounds pretty perpetual to me.
Moses Lake, WA

The Speech-to-Song Illusion

1 Share

In 1995 UCSD psychologist Diana Deutsch was fine-tuning the spoken commentary on a CD when she noticed something odd. When the phrase “sometimes behave so strangely” was repeated on a loop, it came to sound as though it were being sung rather than spoken. When the full surrounding passage was then played in its entirety, this phrase still sounded as though it were being sung (you can hear this here).

The phenomenon is not completely understood, but “the present experiments show that for a phrase to be heard as spoken or as sung, it does not need to have a set of physical properties that are unique to speech, or a different set of physical properties that are unique to song,” the researchers write. “Rather, we must conclude that, assuming the neural circuitries underlying speech and song are at some point distinct and separate, they can accept the same input, but process the information in different ways so as to produce different outputs.”

(Via MetaFilter.)

Read the whole story
davidar
105 days ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

turing complete version numbers

1 Share

A quick standard for when you want to embed an arbitrary program in the version number of your program.

2   increment the data pointer (to point to the next cell to the right).
3   decrement the data pointer (to point to the next cell to the left).
+   increment (increase by one) the byte at the data pointer.
-   decrement (decrease by one) the byte at the data pointer.
.   output the byte at the data pointer.
4   accept one byte of input, storing its value in the byte at the data pointer.
6   if the byte at the data pointer is zero, then instead of moving the instruction pointer forward to the next command, jump it forward to the command after the matching 9 command.
9   if the byte at the data pointer is nonzero, then instead of moving the instruction pointer forward to the next command, jump it back to the command after the matching 6 command. 

This is simply Brainfuck with operators that are legal in (Debian) version numbers kept as-is, and some numbers replacing the rest.

Note that all other operators are ignored as usual. In particular, 1 and 8 are ignored, which make it easy to build version number programs that compare properly with past versions. And in some cases, adding 1 or 8 will be needed to make a particular program be a properly formatted version number.

For example, an infinite loop version number is:

1+69

A nice short hello world is:

1+6-6336+6-8-1-29-6333999222-92-1.1-1-1-8.2.8.2.3333-1.3+1.22222.2.33.3-1.1

Licensing: Yes, there should also be a way to embed a license in a version ... Oh, I mean to say, the Wikipedia excerpt above is CC-BY-SA, and the hello world is based on https://esolangs.org/wiki/Hello_world_program_in_esoteric_languages

Previously: a brainfuck monad

Read the whole story
davidar
113 days ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

Win an xkcd sketch

1 Comment

Want a personalized sketch of yourself as an xkcd-style stick figure? If so, you can preorder my new book How To and submit this form to enter a contest to win a personalized sketch of yourself!

Fifteen entrants will be randomly chosen to win a personalized stick figure portrait. I’ll draw a sketch of you and send it to you, so you can share it online, hang it on your wall, use it as your social media avatar, or whatever else you’d like.

There’s more information at the contest page here, and you can find out more about How To and read the introduction to the book here.



Read the whole story
davidar
166 days ago
reply
US only. :(
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories